Preparatory Committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/292: Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction – First session Agenda item 6: Informal working group on marine genetic resources, including questions on the sharing of benefits Statement by Mr. Jeem Lippwe Deputy Permanent Representative New York, 27 March 2017

Preparatory Committee established by General Assembly resolution 69/292: Development of an international legally binding instrument under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction – First session Agenda item 6: Informal working group on marine genetic resources, including questions on the sharing of benefits Statement by Mr. Jeem Lippwe Deputy Permanent Representative 

New York, 27 March 2017

Madame Facilitator,

thank you for the opportunity to speak.

Micronesia reiterates the view expressed by several delegations to this preparatory committee with respect to the common heritage of mankind. Indeed, the marine genetic resources of the areas beyond national jurisdiction are resources that are for the benefit of all humankind around the world. They are not resources exclusively for a particular nation or a few nations—not even reserved to only those with superior capacity to explore and exploit these resources. Micronesia is of the view that common heritage of mankind means that all nations shall observe and respect equitable and meaningful sharing mechanism in the conservation and use of these valuable resources. Moreover, these resources are not only for the present generation but for future generations as well.

Micronesia wishes to express the view that a BBNJ instrument must be carefully crafted because the “freedom of the high seas” is not absolute. Rather, this freedom of the high seas is with due regard for the interests of other states in the exercise of the same freedom, and it is also subject to the duty to cooperate in the conservation and management of the living resources in the high seas.

Consequently, we cannot support the proposal by South Africa splitting BBNJ between the Area and the High Seas into two separate regimes.

Thank you.

Related posts

Pacific Lunch Dialogue with UN Secretary-General hosted by the Australian Permanent Mission the United Nations

by Martin Zvachula
2 years ago

Statement By H. E. Jane J. Chigiyal, Permanent Rep., On behalf of the States of the Asia-Pacific Group at the International Day of Rememberance of the Victims of Slavery and The Transatlantic Slave Trade

by Martin Zvachula
14 years ago

Address by Mr. Jeem Lippwe, Deputy Permanent Rep., Before the Intergovernmental Preparatory Meeting of the 15th Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development on Inter-linkages and Cross-cutting Issues

by Martin Zvachula
24 years ago
Exit mobile version